Incoterms 2020 can say which party is responsible for import clearance, duties and taxes under the sales contract. They do not, by themselves, decide who Canadian customs law treats as the importer or remove that party’s legal responsibilities. That distinction is the source of many clearance problems.
For a shipment entering Canada, the sales term should be read alongside the commercial invoice, purchase order, carrier instructions and the importer’s customs account arrangements. A buyer in Mississauga, Toronto or Brampton may have agreed to a delivered price while still needing to provide the information and authority required for Canadian accounting. A seller agreeing to DDP may have accepted the commercial obligation to handle import clearance without having the Canadian registration, knowledge or practical ability to do so.
The starting point is the official Incoterms 2020 framework published by the International Chamber of Commerce. The Canadian customs process then determines how those contractual promises can actually be carried out.
What Incoterms 2020 actually allocate
Incoterms rules define selected responsibilities between seller and buyer, including delivery, transport arrangements, risk transfer and certain customs formalities. They are not a complete sales contract. They do not determine ownership, payment terms, product classification, customs value, origin, product admissibility or whether a party is legally permitted to act as an importer in Canada.
For customs purposes, three questions should be separated:
- Who has the contractual task? The sales term may require the seller or buyer to arrange export or import clearance and bear the related cost.
- Who supplies the information? The party with the product, transaction and shipping records may need to provide data even when another party has agreed to pay.
- Who has the legal exposure? Canadian customs obligations attach under Canadian law and cannot be rewritten solely by selecting a delivery term.
An Incoterm is also incomplete unless it names a precise place. “DAP Canada” is less useful than “DAP buyer’s warehouse, Brampton, Ontario, Incoterms 2020.” The named place affects delivery and risk, but it should not be mistaken for a complete instruction about the customs account, importer identity or broker authorization.
How the rules divide export and import clearance
The following summary describes the usual allocation in the sales contract. It is not a substitute for checking the exact wording of the purchase agreement and the shipment’s regulatory requirements.
| Incoterms 2020 rule | Seller normally handles | Buyer normally handles |
|---|---|---|
| EXW | Making the goods available at the named place; generally no export-clearance obligation | Loading, export formalities, transit arrangements and import clearance |
| FCA | Delivery to the agreed point and export clearance | Main carriage, transit where applicable and import clearance |
| CPT or CIP | Export clearance and carriage to the named destination; insurance is added under CIP | Import clearance, duties and taxes |
| DAP | Export clearance, carriage and delivery ready for unloading | Import clearance, duties and taxes, and unloading |
| DPU | Export clearance, carriage, delivery and unloading at the named place | Import clearance, duties and taxes |
| DDP | Export clearance, carriage, import clearance, duties and taxes | Receiving and unloading, subject to the contract |
| FAS, FOB, CFR or CIF | Export clearance; the sea-delivery rule also affects carriage and risk | Import clearance, duties and taxes |
EXW is often treated as a simple pickup term, but it can create a practical export problem when the foreign seller is the party with access to export records. FCA is commonly easier to operate when the seller is expected to complete export formalities. At the Canadian end, DAP and DPU normally leave import clearance with the buyer, while DDP places that task on the seller in the commercial bargain.
The rules are not interchangeable. FAS, FOB, CFR and CIF are intended for sea or inland waterway transport and should not be used casually for an air or parcel shipment. For a shipment arriving through Pearson, a rule designed for ocean transport can create inconsistent instructions between the purchase order, airway bill and broker file.
Why a DDP instruction does not solve the Canadian importer question
DDP is the clearest example of the difference between contractual allocation and legal operation. Under DDP, the seller accepts responsibility in the sale contract for import clearance and the associated costs. That does not automatically create a Canadian importer account, make the seller eligible to perform every regulated activity, or establish who will provide the customs declaration.
A foreign seller using DDP for Canadian deliveries should confirm before accepting the order:
- which entity will be identified as the importer for the Canadian entry;
- whether that entity has the required account and authorization arrangements;
- who will provide the tariff classification, origin, valuation and permit information;
- who will pay duties, taxes and other border charges at accounting; and
- how corrections, reassessments, record retention and post-release questions will be handled.
A Canadian buyer should not assume that “duties paid” means it has no customs role. The buyer may still need to confirm that the commercial invoice describes the transaction correctly, that the importer information is accurate and that the broker has authority to communicate with the appropriate party. If the seller cannot practically act as the importing party, the parties may need to revise the term or document a different operating arrangement before shipment.
The opposite problem occurs with DAP. A buyer may believe the seller is handling everything because freight is delivered to its warehouse. Under DAP, import clearance normally remains the buyer’s responsibility. A delivery appointment in Brampton or Mississauga does not change that allocation. If customs information is incomplete, the carrier may hold the shipment even though the seller arranged transport to the door.
Canadian customs obligations that remain separate from Incoterms
Importer identity and accounting
For commercial goods entering Canada, the party acting as importer generally needs a workable customs-account arrangement and must ensure that the import transaction is properly accounted for. The CBSA importing commercial goods guide describes the broader import process, including documentation, accounting and payment considerations.
Incoterms can allocate the expense between buyer and seller, but they do not make an incorrect importer name acceptable. A broker can follow the client’s written instructions, but the client and other transaction parties need to provide a coherent answer to who purchased the goods, who is receiving them, who is responsible under the contract and who is authorized to account for them.
Classification, origin and value
The party paying the broker or duties is not necessarily the party with the best information for classification. The manufacturer may know the product’s materials and function. The buyer may know the intended use. The seller may hold the invoice and origin records. A reliable file connects those inputs rather than treating the Incoterm as a substitute for them.
The declared value also needs to reflect the transaction and applicable customs rules. A “duty paid” price under DDP or a “freight included” price under another term should not be copied into a customs field without understanding what the amount represents and which costs are included. A broker can identify missing value information and ask targeted questions, but cannot infer the commercial terms safely from a delivery label alone.
Permits, controls and other government requirements
Some goods require information or authorization beyond ordinary customs accounting. Food, plant products, chemicals, controlled goods, consumer products and other regulated commodities may involve agencies or requirements that are not transferred simply because the invoice says DDP or DAP. The responsible party should identify these requirements before dispatch and confirm who will obtain and retain the supporting records.
A practical workflow before the shipment moves
- Write the complete term. State the rule, named place and version, such as “FCA named facility, Incoterms 2020.” Avoid using “FOB” as a general synonym for delivered freight.
- Map the border crossings. Identify the export country, any transit country and the Canadian point of entry. A shipment routed by air through Pearson may require different carrier and document coordination from one moving by truck along the 401/407 corridor.
- Name the customs party. Record who will provide the Canadian importer information, who has authority to instruct the broker and who bears the cost under the sales contract.
- Build the data file. Collect the commercial invoice, packing details, transport document, classification, origin support, valuation information and permits where applicable. The invoice should state the agreed Incoterm and named place accurately.
- Test the arrangement with the carrier and broker. Confirm who receives release instructions, who pays border charges and what happens if the shipment is selected for examination or held for missing information.
- Document exceptions. If the seller pays duties but the buyer is the importing party, or if a third party is involved, record that arrangement in the purchase order and broker instructions rather than relying on an informal email chain.
For recurring imports, the broker can turn this workflow into a standing instruction by vendor, product group and delivery term. That is especially useful for GTA distributors receiving mixed shipments into Mississauga or Toronto facilities, where procurement may select one Incoterm while the transportation team uses another description on the booking.
Common failure modes and the broker’s role
“Delivered” is treated as “customs cleared”
A seller may promise delivery to a warehouse while the selected term leaves import clearance to the buyer. The broker should compare the purchase order, invoice and transport instructions and identify the mismatch before the goods arrive.
The broker is asked to infer the importer from the consignee
A consignee, buyer, owner and importer can be related but are not interchangeable labels. The broker should obtain written confirmation of the importing party and authorization rather than selecting an entity solely from the delivery address.
Duties are included in the price but customs value is unclear
“All-in” pricing can conceal freight, insurance, assists, commissions or other transaction details. The broker should request the underlying price structure and supporting documents instead of treating the seller’s total invoice amount as automatically complete.
The seller assumes DDP covers every Canadian requirement
Import clearance may involve account setup, permits, product data and post-release recordkeeping. A broker can coordinate the customs filing and flag gaps, but the commercial parties still need to decide who supplies the information and who bears the cost when a shipment cannot be released as planned.
What to put in the purchase order
A usable customs instruction should identify the Incoterms 2020 rule and named place, the contracting seller and buyer, the intended Canadian importer, the broker or clearance channel, the party paying duties and taxes, and the documents that must accompany the shipment. It should also state who handles corrections and unexpected border charges.
That level of detail prevents a familiar mistake: using an Incoterm to answer a question it was not designed to answer. Incoterms 2020 can allocate a customs task between the parties. The customs file still needs a correctly identified importer, defensible product and transaction data, and a clear instruction path from the seller and buyer to the broker.

